U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process About Iran?

President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is a lucrative feature that ensures maintenance of security and stability of many organs of management in the U.S.A. The existence of the state and sovereignty of the government of the United States is all dependent on the natural and synthetic features of its decision-making processes as concerns foreign issues. The U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process has suffered immense criticism from other states and governments

The manner in which the country has handled issues concerning other nations is statistical. For instance, actions against Iran and Iraq are tantamount to the relationship existing between the two countries now. Therefore, the existence of intensive U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process as concerns Iran and many other nations has attracted numerous analysis and proportions from the world history

Introduction

Several factors have been considered to be surrounding the natural trend of performance and relationship between many nations. Moreover, this includes the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process

. The process has relative figures that state the amount of time and materials the states have consumed in order to reinstate the prospect of development and growth. The sovereignty measures intercepted between the U.S.A., and many other nations in the world has been built on tantamount relationships. As far as the country assumes and stands by its sovereignty and strategic management issues, it has lived to fruit the performance of growth and development of many other nations

. Within the management, policies are the government structure of governance and leadership as shown.

Decision making processes within the country of state affairs is critical to the relationship that will exist with other nations. The relationship between the U.S.A. And many other nations in the world is also dependent on a number of factors. Such factors touch on how the outside nations view and accept issues based on decision making in the world

. Through the formative structures and management issues within two and more states, it is evident that palatable grounds of growth and development are naturally acceptable between two and more states in the world. In most cases, it has been reiterated that measures to assure equitable plans of management have been established in order to foster equitable control of the foreign affairs between the U.S.A. And many other nations in the world

. The U.S. presidential decision making on Iran is now one of the most controversial president's activities in the U.S.A. Although all have their defenders and detractors, the activity, through not necessarily a polarizing endeavor, engages some decisions that have caused questions as people examine the innate intentions within the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. The U.S. presidents are known for their ability to communicate conservative ideals to the public, and have innate abilities to get people to follow the course of safe existence between the two nations. Some would say though that the decision-making processes have current alienation of the United States from the rest of the world, and has led to this moment in time in which the U.S. is reviled by many countries.

The president's chief objectives seemed to be to influence the relationship between the U.S. And Iran, and end communism as it had stood for the better seven decades. The diplomatic relationships between the U.S.A. And Iran have resulted in immense diplomatic activities and decisions benign made by the presidents of the two countries. The sound effects relayed from the U.S.A. drive the situations and activities in Iran. Therefore, the relationship between the U.S.A. And Iran is based on the decisions that are hard to be achieved.

The U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is dependent on many factors that run through the many trends of management of the offices. For instance, the change of the presidency is not a direct measure of assuring growth measures in the country. The manner in which state affairs are handled is replicated from the innate perceptions that other nations have upon the existing states of growth and development in the country. The existing standards of managing the internal and external affairs in the country are reflective f the common activities of progression. For instance, they touch on the manner in which the U.S. has handled the internal affairs of many other states in the world. In most cases, many issues have influenced on the performance indexes between the U.S.A. And its rival nations like Afghanistan and the Iran

With the consideration of the natural trends of the existing decisions and other facets of international relations, it has been hard to ensure equitable growth and development of many factors of relation between the U.S. And other nations like Iran. For instance, the decisions that are made by the president as relates to another country have to be acceptable and within the sovereign structures in existence. During the reign of President Bush, it was possible to identify a number of decisions being made by the president, yet resulting in disputes and disagreements between the nation and many other organs of growth and development in the region

. With much reflection of the internal affairs in the U.S.A., the decisions made by the president are guided by other measures of management and growth that have to be given extra managerial skills in the country

Statement of problem

What factors affects the U.S. president foreign policy decision-making process about Iran?

Research protocol

The research was conducted within a period of one week. Within this period, all the relevant information from the field was replicated to study in order to analyze and establish summative remarks. The research was based on the establishment of relevant and up-to-date data that was relevant when it comes to handling the question at hand. In order to arrive at all the procedures that establish a common underrating of the U.S. foreign affairs, the research endeavored to establish the present trends of policies and leadership between the two nations and in the world.

Validity and reliability of the design

The research design will try to elicit relevant information that will make it reliable and valid. In order to foster aspects of validity, the study will reiterate on the innate facets that make the study realistic and relevant to the study. The present world is full of many challenges that are handled by the president when it comes to managing state of affairs in the world. The research design used is valid basing. This is based on the notion that it will relay information that is consistent with the present and future trends

. In order to arrive at an equitable ground where all the matters concerned are replicated by the study, the research design will make use of equitable information that include up-to-date information from the U.S. federal government reports

Measurement and design

The research will involve a number of measurements in order to elicit a reliable study and conclusions at the end of the research

Qualitative measurement: the study will involve qualitative research in order to reach all the relevant information within the field of study. Qualitative study involves the collection of data that are based on direct or first-hand sources. Such measurements will ensure that the study has revealed all the necessary information that is concerned with the establishment of good and reliable information in the field. This measurement protocol will establish a valid state of affairs that ensure equitable management of the resources available for study

Quantitative measurement: this measurement will seek to establish backup information that is related to the general performances of different parameters in handling the foreign matters of the country.

Sources of evidence to support arguments

Various sources are poised to be in support of the arguments in the study. Based on the research questions, it will be relevant to know that all the details and historical backgrounds of the U.S. internal and external affairs are evident to the study. The study relates how different measurements of growth and development have advanced towards the establishment of the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. This happens as concerns Iran and many other nations in the world.

Argument 1

Why the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is assessed based on the interests of the state without considering the immediate needs of Iran?

This argument tries to relay why there are many facilities of management. These are managements that have not been established in the U.S. As part of fulfilling the interests of Iran other than those of the U.S.A.

Argument 2

The U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process as concerns Iran is unsuitable when it comes to handling or maintaining the sovereignty of any nation

This argument will try to establish a fact that the problems between the U.S. And Iran are categorical of the mistakes made by the decision makers in both nations

Review of existing work and theories

Hypothesis

Methodology

The study will involve a number…